The M&A Trends Set to Shape Wealth Management in 2021
Investment Adviser News 1/22/21
The M&A Trends Set to Shape Wealth Management in 2021
After a white-hot 2020, M&A experts believe we still haven’t reached a peak; many expect deal structures to evolve and new buyers to find the market in the coming months.
2020 was a record year for merger and acquisition activity in the wealth management industry, despite a significant slowdown in the second quarter driven by COVID-19 which caused many advisors to pause, delay, change directions or stop deals altogether.
But as the industry looks forward, experts point to several trends set to shape wealth management M&A this year, including the continued expansion of options for advisors looking to buy or sell, the rise of internal succession funding platforms, and an increased use of partial monetization strategies.
What transactions count as a deal differs slightly depending on which firm is doing the counting, but all agree that 2020 was a record. Echelon Partners recorded 205 transactions during the year, up from 203 in 2019, an eight-year record high. DeVoe & Company, another firm that reports M&A activity in the RIA space, counted 159 deals in 2020, up from 132 in 2019, the highest in seven years and four times the number of deals in 2014. Fidelity also said 2020 broke records set in 2019 for the most transactions among RIAs, at 130 deals, up 4%, and highest AUM volume, up 22% year-over-year.
Another Record Year Ahead
David DeVoe, founder and CEO of DeVoe & Company, said 2021 is currently on track to deliver another record year, at around 200 transactions. He’s not concerned that the M&A space is getting frothy.
“For a hyper-fragmented industry with 5,000 firms over a hundred million (in assets), a couple hundred transactions is reasonable,” DeVoe said. “It's even low for what we can expect given the dynamics in the market.”
That said, if M&A activity spikes another 30% to 40% year-over-year, that would be unhealthy, he said.
“As long as we have a steady climb up toward that point, I think we'll experience healthy M&A, but if we had a huge spike, let's say 2021 we went from 160 deals in 2020 to 320 deals in 2021, that I think starts to become a strain. Buyers are already working around the clock, they're working weekends. And to have that many more sellers come out in the marketplace in a short period of time, I think it could overtax the system.”
In particular, DeVoe expects us to see a surge in the sub $1 billion deals, which took longer to get to market in 2020.
The fundamentals driving M&A activity are still there. Access to capital is at an all-time high with interest rates at historic lows. There’s a need to consolidate to stay competitive, keep up with compliance and technology developments, and build scale, said Carolyn Armitage, managing director at Echelon Partners. Many advisors also are getting older and in need of a succession plan, and have used COVID-19 as the catalyst to take action.
“We have this beautiful intersection of demographics of advisors needing a succession plan and of course, as they age, their clients are aging and they're in need of financial planning more than ever before,” Armitage said.
Jeremy Holly, LPL Financial senior vice president and head of Advisor Financial Solutions, said the broker/dealer is currently working on 100 deals within LPL. And while there was a lull in deals in the second quarter of last year, there was also a wave of innovation in the second half of the year, where buyers shifted a lot of the risk to the sellers and changed deal structures to get these transactions done.
Sellers were amenable to those changes, but now that there’s less uncertainty, deal structures are shifting back.
“The shift back to buyers taking on more risk has definitely occurred,” Holly said. “What it tells me is that the M&A deal model has got resiliency, and folks will find a way to get a deal done. And they have some levers they can pull when things like this happen.”
Experts agree that 2021 will bring more choices to advisors looking to buy or sell their practice, as more capital comes into the space.
Scott Slater, M&A specialist and Fidelity Institutional vice president of practice management and consulting, said the fundamental operating nature of RIAs is attractive to buyers, but buying more assets under management is not the only motivator.
“Over time, I think you’ll see some really interesting models," Slater said. "It’s not just about consolidating firms; it’s about building better enterprises that in the end should provide better solutions for clients of these wealth management firms.”
Slater expects to see many of the same well-prepared and well-capitalized buyers as we did this year, including the consolidators and aggregators, but also for new players to come onto the scene as well.
If you look at this year’s list of top acquirers (see table below), firms like Canada-based CI Financial and Creative Planning, Peter Mallouk’s RIA, are relatively new acquirers.
In November, former Cetera CEO Larry Roth launched Kingswood Acquisition Corp., a SPAC sponsored by the major shareholders in British wealth management firm Kingswood Group and a sister company to Kingswood U.S., with plans to use proceeds from the public markets to invest in U.S.-based RIAs and wealth management firms.
Another newcomer, TRIA Capital Partners, which provides minority financing to wealth management firms, recently announced its first investment, taking a minority stake in Modera Wealth Management, an RIA in Westwood, N.J. Modera recently merged with Independence Advisors, a Wayne, Pa. RIA, creating a $4.4 billion firm.
Armitage said she’s never seen as many private equity firms interested in the industry as she does today. In 2008, prior to the economic crash, there were about 75 private equity firms investing in the space; today there are over 275 of them, according to Echelon.
And while most private equity firms—frequently the investors in many large RIA firms currently—seek an exit strategy in four to seven years, some position themselves as longer-term investors, with a nine- to 10-year hold, which is more tolerable for the seller, Armitage said. "They are thinking ‘Ten years—I’m not going to be here in 10 years, so that’s fine.’”
The Rise of Internal Succession Funding Platforms
Independent broker/dealers are bringing new options to firms, with several launching internal succession funding platforms to help their advisors do transactions. DeVoe expects the trend to continue.
In 2019, LPL Financial launched a deal execution platform to help advisors with all the pieces involved in a given deal and providing them a single point of contact on one platform. LPL will finance deals from its own balance sheet. The firm has shortened the time to complete deals from six to nine months to 60 to 90 days. Holly likens it to an investment bank for their advisors.
Last April, LaSalle St. Securities, a midsize independent broker/dealer, corporate RIA and insurance business in Chicago, started providing loans with zero interest rates to help facilitate its advisors’ mergers and acquisitions.
And more recently, Commonwealth formalized a succession planning and M&A capability, doing internal valuations, and providing templates for deal structures. The offering also includes a more stated packaging of financing options, whether that be lending capital, growth capital or some combination of the two.
“The motivation for them creating that is they want to retain those assets inside their organization, and I think they’ve always needed to create some sort of transition opportunity to make that happen and help their existing advisors have a liquidity event,” Slater said.
Another trend set to continue into this year is advisors selling minority stakes in their businesses. In fact, players such as Merchant Investment Management and TRIA specialize in taking partial stakes in RIAs.
LPL’s Holly said about 10% to 20% of the deals his firm does internally are partial sales. A lot of sellers want to continue to have the lion’s share of the cash flow and ownership stake, but they want to take some chips off the table and bring in somebody who has financial wherewithal.
Fidelity’s Slater said his firm started tracking these minority investments for the first time this year. There are a lot of generalist private equity firms looking for a way to have a stake in this market, and that’s one way for them to do so.
“From a seller’s standpoint, it’s also that they really want that partnership because maybe the investor they have brings a skillset and strength around M&A themselves, and the firm that’s selling wants to have an inorganic strategy,” Slater said. “And they need that help—somebody who can build source opportunities, help them structure them, provide the capital for it, and frankly just accelerate what they’re doing.”
Echelon’s Armitage also expects such partial monetization deals to accelerate; she agrees that this gives an RIA access to their strategic partner’s deal prowess, while maintaining control and their branding. And if the partner takes a stake of 20% or less, the advisor doesn’t need client approval to take it, and an investment that small doesn’t have to be made public.
“We do expect that there is a hidden market out there of at least three to four times more than what we're seeing because of the private firm nature of our industry,” she said.
Source: wealthmanagement.com 1-22-21 Author: Diane Britton
Schwab Acknowledges Poor Service As Advisors Suffer
Schwab admitted it is providing advisors with poor service lately, but its ongoing integration with TDAI isn't to blame, it said.
As the Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade Institutional merger and integration moves forward, advisors are noticing a decline in client services from both firms. Several advisors have identified problems stretching back for months, they said, including incorrect processing and “massive delays.”
An error in TDAI-processed automated savings instructions spurred Michael Baker, an advisor at Vertex Capital Advisors, LLC, in Fort Mill, S.C. to take to social media expressing frustration with TDAI client service having “fallen off a cliff.”
“It’s just becoming quite a slog to deal with them,” he said, after criticizing the company on social media, “and they are making it much more difficult to work quickly and efficiently.” He cited paperwork that returned a NIGO, only to later discover it was processed incorrectly, “form ambiguity,” and “no follow-up[s]” as just some of the problems that have been building “for weeks—if not months.”
Problems that Baker had encountered were mostly service-related, not tech-related, he added. Charles Schwab cut key TDAI personnel in October, part of its integration-related layoffs that affected approximately 1,000 employees, or 3% of the combined workforce.
Baker was soon joined by other advisors sharing their own negative experiences.
Hold times were a common complaint. “Call times have increased SIGNIFICANTLY,” said Darren Straniero, founder of OnPlane Financial Advisors in Darnestown, Md. via Twitter.
With staff still working from home, and Schwab and TDAI in the midst of an integration expected to take a minimum of 18 months, advisors aren’t sure where service has broken. But they know something isn’t right.
“They are awful lately. Double check everything they do,” said Mark Meredith, founder of Meredith Wealth Planning in Maryville, Ill., in another social media post.
“Things that used to be completed in one day, now take five or six days,” he explained in an email. “I'm not sure if it is a result of everyone working from home, or from the Schwab merger activity. Either way, it has been a noticeable difference.” He first started noticing problems and delays in the middle of 2020.
“I’ve been waiting on a large non-ACAT from Morgan Stanley since December 11,” added Rockie Zeigler III, a planner at RP Zeigler Investment Services in Peoria, Ill. via social media. “At this point I have zero idea [whose] fault it is anymore.”
“In my opinion, it’s a hang up at the processing department at Morgan Stanley,” he clarified via email, adding that he was typically happy with TDAI's service. “But, again, I’m not 100% sure. Maybe this is just how long these things take.”
“Things are beyond absurd with Schwab,” said Michael Brown, CIO for The Planning Group, in Northfield, Ill. in a social media post. “In December, waiting beyond an hour [for client service] was the norm.” Schwab and TDAI are in the midst of their integration and advisors have not all been brought under one roof.
In a statement, Schwab acknowledged the poor service it had been providing to advisors, attributing the missteps to “a confluence of challenging factors.” It did not describe what those factors were.
“We are aware there have been instances over the past few months in which we have not met our usual high standards for client service,” according to the statement. “We are actively working to resolve issues that may have led to an unsatisfactory service experience or longer than usual hold times.
“These issues are the result of a confluence of challenging factors but, importantly, they are not due to the ongoing integration of Schwab and TDAI. We certainly regret any inconvenience our service levels may have created and we’re working to resolve them as quickly as possible,” the statement continued.
One unnamed source inside TDAI said employee attrition is to blame. The integrated company is not recognizing the value of its staff, which is being hired away by competing incumbents and not being replaced, said the source. “This whole acquisition has been a financial synergy and shareholder value play; it is not about the people at the company.”
The integrated firm is “definitely not adding bodies to make up for the natural attrition from these people being hired away,” the source added. “That means the staff left are having to do more with less.”
Source: wealthmanagement.com 1-22-21 Author: Samuel Steinberger
Start your TARGETED investment advisor/financial planner recruiting and business development efforts today. Recruiting via email is efficient, targeted, cost effective and flat out works.
99% good email addresses
Lists are literally updated daily
Guidance offered on effective email sending
California only list 100,794 Records
Florida only list 50,408 Records
Texas only list 27,976 Records
Illinois only list 20,892 Records
New York only list 67,037 Records
Massachusetts only list 25,004 Records
Georgia only list 29,496 Records
Wisconsin only list 15,943 Records
NATIONAL LIST 628.063 Records
100% of the records
have email addresses
• Records available in all states-Call or reply for record counts and pricing.
WHEN YOU LAND JUST ONE NEW REPRESENTATIVE FROM THIS INITIATIVE THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT IS HUGE.
National Sales Manager
Specialty Contact Databases