Uber, Lyft Drivers Are Employees Under New State Law, California Regulator Rules; In a Close Race, Auto Insurance Customers Prefer Company Websites Over Agents
Insurance News for 6/12/2020
Uber, Lyft Drivers Are Employees Under New State Law, California Regulator Rules
Drivers working for ride-hailing services such as Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. will be considered employees under California’s new gig worker law, the state’s leading industry regulator said on Thursday.
Shares in Uber and Lyft fell 5.3% and 4.2%, respectively, in early trading, with the new order striking at the heart of the “gig economy” business model of technology platforms like Uber and Lyft that rely on cheaper contract workers.
The decision, by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which regulates ride-hailing companies across the state, comes six months after a state law took effect that makes it tougher for companies to classify workers as contractors rather than employees. The latter designation exempts them from paying for overtime, healthcare and workers’ compensation.
The CPUC in an order on Thursday said it had to enforce state law, determining that drivers for transportation network companies (TNCs), the industry term for ride-hailing operators, would be considered employees going forward.
“For now, TNC drivers are presumed to be employees and the Commission must ensure that TNCs comply with those requirements that are applicable to the employees of an entity subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction,” the commission said in the document https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M339/K545/339545137.PDF.
The companies have said in the past their drivers were properly classified as independent contractors, adding that the majority of them would not want to be considered employees, cherishing the flexibility of on-demand work.
“If California regulators force rideshare companies to change their business model it would affect our ability to provide reliable and affordable services, along with threatening access to this essential work Californians depend on,” Uber said in a statement.
Uber in December sued to block the new law, known as AB5, arguing that it punished app-based companies and was unconstitutional.
Lyft in a statement called the CPUC’s decision “flawed” and said forcing drivers to be employees will have horrible economic consequences for California.
Both companies pointed to a November ballot initiative exempting them from the law, for which they, together with food delivery platform DoorDash, have earmarked $90 million. Under the companies’ proposal, drivers would receive mileage-based subsidies, healthcare stipends and occupational accident insurance, while maintaining their flexibility as contractors.
Labor unions have sharply criticized the proposal for creating a “new underclass of workers” that lack fundamental protections such as sick pay and unemployment insurance.
California in early May filed its own lawsuit against Uber and Lyft, arguing the companies misclassified their drivers in violation of the new law.
Source: Claims Journal – 6/11/20 Author: Akanksha Rana and Tina Bellon
In a Close Race, Auto Insurance Customers Prefer Company Websites Over Agents
Remember all the talk that digital transformation would disrupt the auto insurance industry? Well, it’s real, according to the consultants at J.D. Power.
The firm says its 2020 U.S. Auto Insurance Study proves that insurance company websites—for the first time in the study’s 21-year history—officially surpass agents in terms of importance to client interaction and service by providing higher customer satisfaction.
However, the race is still very close.
According to the survey, customer experience with auto insurer websites contributes more to satisfaction than agents, accounting for 34 percent of an insurer’s total interaction score. That’s one percentage point higher than in the agent channel, which accounts for 33 percent of total interaction satisfaction.
“We’ve seen this trend developing for several years, but this is the first time that the digital channel has become the preferred means of interacting with auto insurers, exceeding one-on-one communication with agents,” said Robert Lajdziak, senior consultant for insurance intelligence at J.D. Power.
Lajdziak believes there is a clear message in the results, as close as they are.
“This has huge implications for the industry because it puts the focus squarely on digital investment to notably expand creating seamless customer touch points. It’s an area in which the major national carriers excel, versus hyper-local, albeit knowledgeable, agent networks,” he said.
Overall customer satisfaction with auto insurers improved in 2020 to a record high of 835 (on a 1,000-point scale). National carriers such as GEICO, State Farm and Allstate have earned some of the most significant gains, together ranking highest in six of the 11 regions in the study, aided by the growth of their digital channels.
It’s not all good news for insurers. They have some work to do building trust with customers. According to J.D. Power, there is a strong correlation between scores for trust and those for overall satisfaction. On average, a one-point increase in trust (on a 5-point scale) would correlate with a 118-point increase in overall satisfaction. Despite the importance of trust, only 42 percent of all auto insurance customers say they “strongly agree” that they trust their insurer.
J.D. Power analysts contend that by
“fulfilling service expectations and putting customers’ interests first, among other customer-centric initiatives, insurers can succeed in this critical-to-retention metric.”
The study affirms that customer loyalty is heavily influenced by claim history. Customers are least likely to renew their policies when part of an insurance claim is denied. Conversely, when customers have experienced a claim that was fully approved and settled, satisfaction is significantly higher and generates the greatest likelihood of renewal.
“What’s more, those customers who experienced sub-optimal claim outcomes and remained with their carrier were more diligent about understanding their policy and what it covers going forward,” the report says.
The study is based on responses from 40,123 auto insurance customers and was fielded in February-March 2020.
Source: Insurance Business America – 6/11/20 Author: JD Power
List of Insurance Agents, List of Loan Officers and List of Financial Planners
TARGETED INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL RECRUITING & BIZ DEV---EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER LIST OF ACTIVE INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS -Reach insurance agents efficiently.
- 99% good email addresses
- Lists are literally updated daily
- Guidance offered on effective email sending
May 2020 RECORD COUNTS
-California only list 186,477 Records
-Florida only list 70,325 Records
-Texas only list 31,641 Records
-Illinois only list 14,129 Records
-Maryland only list 33,563 Records
-Massachusetts only list 24,672 Records
-Georgia only list 49,096 Records
-Wisconsin only list 24,068 Records
NATIONAL LIST 792,980 Records
100% of the records have email addresses
· Records available in all states-Call or reply for record counts and pricing.
WHEN YOU LAND JUST ONE NEW AGENT FROM THIS INITIATIVE THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT IS HUGE.
YOU OWN THE LIST AND CAN SEND TO IT AS OFTEN AS YOU LIKE. MY SUGGESTION IS WEEKLY.
100% of the records have email addresses
RELIABILITY-99% deliverability/good email addresses.
QUALITY EMAIL SERVICES AVAILABLE-Achieve a high inbox placement at a value price.
Lists available for Mortgage Loan Officers and Financial Planners
574,704 Mortgage Loan Officer Records
447,258 Financial Planner Records